FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Click for Print Version

29.) Are the actions of the Attorney General of Maryland leading to unnecessary cancer deaths?

In view of the ongoing litigation, it is obviously difficult for me to answer this question. But allow me to point out some pertinent facts and observations:

First, as I have mentioned elsewhere, the Attorney General of Maryland has never taken action (which, with his broad discretionary injunctive power would be easy to do) to remove the products from the market. This well may be because, despite his self-appointed mantle as arbiter of consumer health, he has not found one witness out of the hundreds of thousands of medical experts in the United States to challenge the fact that cesium kills cancer cells.

Second, many people who had been given a death sentence by conventional medicine and were subsequently saved by cesium, have told us that they are afraid to come forward and talk about their

experience out of fear of reprisal by the State. We are certain that many other people have not contacted us out of a similar fear.

This fear as well as the pernicious lies promulgated by the Attorney General’s staff have likely had tragic results. Let me cite one example.

Within the past year, our local NBC TV affiliate ran the heart-breaking story of a beautiful young woman – a former Miss Teen USA – who was dying of cancer despite the best efforts of the doctors at Johns Hopkins University Medical Center. I was advised after her death that her family had been contacted via email by someone who had referred them to my web page. Needless to say, they never contacted me. I can only assume that the widespread publicity given to the Attorney General’s false and misleading statements dissuaded them from even investigating the possibility that cesium might help her.

The lies persist to this day.

In a recent press release trumpeting his Appellate Court “victory” the Maryland Attorney General made reference to the “unconscionable” $12,000 or more you charged for the cesium therapy. I know you addressed this issue elsewhere on your web site in your letter to Senator Breaux, but could you address it again.

The remarks referenced above are either a flagrant, deliberate lie on the part of the Attorney General, or evidence of his total incompetence. If he really is aware of the facts in the case, then he must know that the $12,000 plus fee he refers to was charged by a doctor in Virginia for a two to three week intravenous cesium and aloe vera treatment. The doctor, who had 35 years experience as an orthopedic surgeon, included all costs in this figure.

The company I financed, T-Up, Inc., provided the doctor with sterile aloe vera at a cost somewhat above the $75 per bottle charged for the oral form of aloe vera. Any minimal profit T-Up., Inc. made was exclusively from the sale of the sterile product. What he doesn’t say, of course, is that many late-stage cancer patients are still alive 4 to 5 years later because of the intravenous procedure performed by the doctor in Virginia.

Compare this, if you will, with the 1% to 3% success rate of most conventional forms of chemotherapy in treating metastasized cancer at a cost of $300,000 to $600,000 for their barbaric treatment!

Back to Frequently Asked Questions